Author
|
Topic: another test
|
rnelson Member
|
posted 01-10-2008 08:45 AM
Here is another.Chart 1 page 1
Chart 1 page 2
Chart 1 page 3
Chart 2 page 1
Chart 2 page 2
Chart 2 page 3
Chart 3 page 1
Chart 3 page 2
Chart 3 page 3
r
------------------ "Gentlemen, you can't fight in here. This is the war room." --(Stanley Kubrick/Peter Sellers - Dr. Strangelove, 1964)
IP: Logged |
stat Member
|
posted 01-10-2008 10:47 AM
Spot totals +4 -2
DI Was this guy being obstinent on chart 2---looks like he was engaging in behavorial cm's, but typically after being confrionted with crude countermeasures, the following charts (in this case chart 3) would be punctuated with higher levels of arousal across the board----but not in this case. I smell fish, and I bet your report stated as much. What happened on chart 2? Did this sex offender "expose" something or some behavior to you? lol
[This message has been edited by stat (edited 01-10-2008).] IP: Logged |
rnelson Member
|
posted 01-10-2008 11:12 AM
Sorry Ch2p2 was the wrong graphic. Fixed now.He was moving at the onset of chart 2. I probably admonished him (gently and professionally, of course), but didn't mark it. r ------------------ "Gentlemen, you can't fight in here. This is the war room." --(Stanley Kubrick/Peter Sellers - Dr. Strangelove, 1964)
IP: Logged |
ebvan Member
|
posted 01-10-2008 11:50 AM
Stat, did you receive my reply to your email?IP: Logged |
stat Member
|
posted 01-10-2008 11:54 AM
Yes Ebvan, thanks for the speedy shot. IP: Logged |
sackett Moderator
|
posted 01-10-2008 12:09 PM
Ray,I have him -1 / -6 Clearly DI. Jim
IP: Logged |
Buster Member
|
posted 01-10-2008 12:17 PM
Nelson, when you get a chance I want you to look at a chart of mine with a HUGE cardio, It doesn't look like a move, but it is in a relevant and looks to big to be true. IP: Logged |
Barry C Member
|
posted 01-10-2008 12:29 PM
Okay Jim, I'm getting concerned now. I have the same score - with maybe a -7 in the second spot, but at this point why squint over the pneumos?IP: Logged |
ebvan Member
|
posted 01-10-2008 12:31 PM
I scored -1 -7 DI (without a pencil) But I also think there may be something you're not sharing with us about what occurred between chart 1 and chart 2 that would result in a physiological or behavioral change in your subject. Don't keep us in suspense for too long. ------------------ Ex scientia veritas IP: Logged |
rnelson Member
|
posted 01-10-2008 12:36 PM
This is a single issue exam.
OSS-3 gives an SR result. Buster, you can email me anytime, or my fax # is 720 554 7677 The charts I posted yesterday have large cardio responses that make me suspicious. But the movement channel is working and shows nothing, plus the pneumos are fairly consistent. I'm doubtful someone could manufacture those cardio responses through mental efforts, but I don't really know.
r ------------------ "Gentlemen, you can't fight in here. This is the war room." --(Stanley Kubrick/Peter Sellers - Dr. Strangelove, 1964)
IP: Logged |
rnelson Member
|
posted 01-10-2008 12:45 PM
Ebvan,No tricks. Its just a DI test. The two questions are nearly identical. He was moving at the onset of chart 2, then stopped. I think some of the tracing adjustment flags may not have printed These two are rather easy to score, though this one is interesting because of the total/spot differences.
I'll look around to see if I have an uglier test somewhere. Just to see if we tend to disagree more. r ------------------ "Gentlemen, you can't fight in here. This is the war room." --(Stanley Kubrick/Peter Sellers - Dr. Strangelove, 1964)
IP: Logged |
Taylor Member
|
posted 01-10-2008 12:56 PM
-1 -5 = -6 DIIP: Logged |
Bob Member
|
posted 01-10-2008 02:35 PM
Ray,My scoring (with a 3 pt scale) RQ4: 0 RQ6: -7 I believe something very suspicious is going on at Chrt 2 following SRQ 2 with the blood pressure arousal and continues throughout the chart. Cht 3 seems suspicious to me too, from the declining BP and may be a reversal of what he did on Cht 2. I would not rule out countermeasures. Where is Gordon Barland when you need him? Even though movement sensors are employed, Do not discount unobserved movements can still be occurring. In the past I have instructed clients to move the rght/ left arms and then the rght/ left legs in a secretive covert manner as part of my acquaintance test. More than once I have seen them move an arm or leg covertly without detection by the movement sensors (5 independant sensors being recorded). Ironically, on those occasions that the movements were not detected by the sensors, there was significant apnea or inspiratory breath hold while completing the instruction (task), and the length of which appeared to be directly related to the amount of mental effort they were employing to complete the task requested ‘secretively and covertly’. In essence, they were trying so hard not to get caught moving by me (as instructed) they litterly forget to breathe. (I gotta learn how to post charts- to this forum ! What an advantage for feed back.) Bob
IP: Logged |
sackett Moderator
|
posted 01-10-2008 02:40 PM
Barry,if you and I both agree on the outcome, it is no longer an opinion of deception, it is fact! Jim IP: Logged |
blalock Member
|
posted 01-11-2008 10:09 AM
I have 0 and -7 = DI.Ben [This message has been edited by blalock (edited 01-11-2008).] IP: Logged |